Compression Damage in European vs. Asian Latex
The difference in how European latex compared to Asian latex handles compression damage from vacuum packing often boils down to their respective production processes and quality standards.
European Latex:
Higher Quality Standards and Advanced Production
European latex manufacturers prioritize higher quality standards and employ advanced technologies in production. They implement stringent quality control measures throughout, from raw material selection to meticulous processing techniques. This results in latex that is more resilient and less susceptible to compression damage when vacuum-packed.
Asian Latex:
Variability in Production and Quality
Conversely, Asian latex manufacturers may vary in their production standards and processes, leading to differences in latex quality and resilience. Lower quality control or less advanced production techniques can result in latex that is more prone to compression damage during vacuum packing. Factors such as latex formulation, curing processes, and the age of the latex also influence its resistance to compression.
Durability Testing in European Latex Manufacturing
For instance, our Belgian manufacturer conducts rigorous durability tests. One such test is the dynamic fatigue test according to ISO 3385, where a test piece undergoes 80,000 compressions under a 75kg weight. This simulates repeated sitting and standing on the mattress edge, checking for height and firmness loss. Another test, the dynamic fatigue durability test EN 1957 (also known as the “roll test”), involves rolling a full latex core 60,000 times under approximately 140kg. This evaluates height and firmness loss, simulating movement and turning over 10 years of use. Limited loss in height and firmness ensures consistent quality and durability of the material over time.